•  

Postscript : Type 1 : Type 3 Information

History

The concepts of the PostScript language were seeded in 1976 when John Warnock was working at Evans and Sutherland, a famous computer graphics company. At that time John Gaffney was developing an interpreter for a large three-dimensonal graphics database of New York harbour. Gaffney conceived the Design System language to process the graphics, very similar to the Forth programming language.

In 1978 Evans and Sutherland asked Warnock to move from the San Francisco bay area to their main headquarters in Utah, but he was not interested in moving. He then joined Xerox PARC to work with Martin Newell. They rewrote Design System to create JaM (John and Martin) which was used for VLSI design and the investigation of type and graphics printing. This work later evolved into an expanded system known as InterPress.

After watching Xerox sit on InterPress, as they had with many of their other technologies, Warnock left with Chuck Geschke and founded Adobe Systems in December 1982. They created a simpler language, similar to InterPress, called PostScript, which went on the market in 1985. At about this time they were visited by Steve Jobs, who urged them to adapt PostScript to be used as the language for driving laser printers, which was added to a Canon printing engine to create the LaserWriter.

In March of 1985, the Apple LaserWriter was the first printer to ship with PostScript, sparking the desktop publishing (DTP) revolution in the mid-1980s. The combination of technical merits and widespread availability made PostScript a language of choice for graphical output for printing applications. For a time an interpreter for this language was a ubiquitous component of laser printers, into the 1990s.

Once the de facto standard for electronic distribution of final documents, PostScript has effectively been succeeded by PDF in this area. By 2001 there were fewer printer models which came with support for PostScript, largely as a result of the increasing power of the built-in printing systems supplied with most operating systems. The use of a PostScript laser printer does, however, significantly reduce the CPU workload involved in printing documents, and does allow typeset-quality printing without the need for printer-specific drivers.

Traditional printing

Prior to the introduction of PostScript, printers were designed to print character output given the text-typically in ASCII-as input. There were a number of technologies for this task, but most shared the property that the characters were physically difficult to change, as they were stamped onto typewriter keys, bands of metal, or optical plates.

This changed to some degree with the increasing popularity of dot matrix printers. The characters on these systems were "drawn" as a series of dots, the proper dots to use defined as a font table inside the printer. As they grew in sophistication, dot matrix printers started including several built-in fonts from which the user could select, and some models allowed the user to download their own custom character graphics into the printer.

Dot matrix printers also introduced the ability to print raster graphics. The graphics were interpreted by the computer and sent as a series of dots to the printer using a series of escape sequences. These printer control languages varied from printer to printer, requiring program authors to create numerous drivers.

"Real" graphics printing was left to special-purpose devices, called plotters. Plotters did share a common command language, HPGL, but were of limited use for anything other than printing graphics. In addition, they tended to be expensive and slow, and thus rare.

PostScript printing

PostScript broke tradition by combining the best features of both printers and plotters. Like plotters, PostScript offered a high quality line art and a single control language that could be used across any brand of printer. Like dot-matrix printers, PostScript offered simple ways to generate pages of text and raster graphics. Unlike either, PostScript could place all of these types of media on a single page, which offered far more flexibility than any printer or plotter previously had.

PostScript went beyond the typical printer control language, and was a complete programming language of its own. Many applications can transform a document into a PostScript program whose execution will result in the original document. This program can be sent to an interpreter in a printer, which results in a printed document, or to one inside another application, which will display the document on-screen. Since the document-program is the same regardless of its destination, it is called device-independent.

PostScript is also noteworthy for implementing on-the fly rasterization; everything, even text, is specified in terms of straight lines and cubic Bézier curves (previously found only in CAD applications), which allows arbitrary scaling, rotating and other transformations. When the PostScript program is interpreted, the interpreter converts these instructions into the dots needed to form the output.

Font handling

Almost as complex as PostScript itself was PS's handling of fonts. The rich font system used the PS graphics primitives to draw characters as line art, which could then be rendered at any resolution. This might sound like a reasonably straightforward concept, but there are a number of typographic issues that had to be considered.

One is that fonts do not actually scale linearly at small sizes; features of the characters will become proportionally too large or small and they start to "look wrong." PostScript avoided this problem with the inclusion of hints which could be saved along with the font outlines. Basically they are additional information in horizontal or vertical bands that help identify the features in each letter that are important for the rasterizer to maintain. The result was significantly better-looking fonts even at low resolution; it was formerly believed that hand-tuned bitmap fonts were required for this task.

At the time the technology for including these hints in fonts was carefully guarded, and the hinted fonts were compressed and encrypted into what Adobe called a Type 1 Font. Type 1 was effectively a simplification of the PS system to store outline information only, as opposed to being a complete language (PDF is similar in this regard). Adobe would then sell licenses to the Type 1 technology at a very high cost to those wanting to add hints to their own fonts. Those who were happy without hints, or didn't want to spend the money, were left with the so-called Type 3 Font. Type 3 fonts allowed for all the sophistication of the PostScript language, but without the standardized approach to hinting. Other differences further added to the confusion.

The cost of the licensing was considered by many to be too high, and Adobe continued to stonewall on more attractive rates. It was this issue that led Apple to design their own system, TrueType, around 1991. Immediately following the announcement of TrueType, Adobe published the specification for Type 1 fonts. Retail tools such as Altsys Fontographer (now owned by Macromedia) added the ability to create Type 1 fonts. Since then, many free Type 1 fonts have been released; for instance, the fonts used with the TeX typesetting system are available in this format.

In the early 1990s there were several other systems for storing outline-based fonts, developed by Bitstream and Metafont for instance, but none included a general-purpose printing solution and they were therefore not widely used as a result.

Other implementations

In the 1980s, Adobe got most of their revenue from licensing fees from their implementation of PostScript for printers, known as a raster image processor or RIP. These were fairly expensive, and typically ran on a limited selection of hardware. With the introduction of a number of RISC-based platforms in the mid 1980s, Adobe always seemed to be a step behind in supporting the new machines.

Third-party implementations of PostScript interpreters became quite common as a result. These tended to be found either in low-cost laser printers, or in very high-end typesetting equipment. Some of these third-party solutions are still widely used in the typesetting world, particularly the one developed by Phoenix Systems that is standard in all black-and-white Hewlett-Packard laser printers (as of 2005).

However, many printers don't support any RIP in their basic versions. For these, a free PostScript interpreter called Ghostscript is available. It prints PostScript documents on non-PostScript printers using the CPU of the host computer to do the rasterization, sending the result as a single large bitmap to the printer. It can also be used to preview PostScript documents on a computer monitor, and to convert PostScript pages into almost any raster graphics format such as TIFF, PNG, and so on.

Usage as a display system

With PostScript becoming a de-facto standard for printed output, it was natural to consider using the same language for describing the screen output as well. The rapid increase in CPU power in the late 1980s, combined with an interest in windowing systems, led to several attempts to create a display system that used PostScript as its primary display technology.

There are a number of advantages to using PS as the display system. One is that the fonts on other systems required the user to keep not only bitmaps for the screen, but also Type 1 for the printer. Using PS on the display would eliminate this and require only one set. Another advantage is that it allows for the "dumbing down" of printers. When the LaserWriter was released it was the most powerful (and expensive) machine in Apple's lineup, a result of needing considerable processing power and memory to render the page at a "high" resolution of 300 dpi in a reasonable amount of time. In contrast, the 400-dpi printer that shipped with the NeXT platform contained no CPU at all, instead using the computer's CPU to do the rendering and passing the rendered page as a bitmap to the printer.

But the main advantage in using PostScript as a windowing system is that it allows one to write desktop publishing (DTP) and other graphically-intensive applications with a single set of graphics routines. The same code that is drawing to the window can be used to draw to the printer without any translation. DTP applications on traditional systems require the programmer to construct the GUI editor in the platform's own graphics system (for example, QuickDraw on the Macintosh, or GDI on Microsoft Windows) and then write additional code to translate the graphics into proper PostScript for printing. This often takes up the majority of the programming effort on such projects and is a major source of bugs.

The two main examples of PostScript as a display technology are Display PostScript (DPS) and NeWS. They differed dramatically in terms of where the display logic was applied; in DPS the view system was left to the hosting OS, whereas under NeWS the entire display was written in PS and ran in a single complex interpreter. While certainly very interesting, it's not clear that NeWS is in fact a better approach.

The language

PostScript is a full-fledged, Turing-complete, programming language. Typically, PostScript programs are not produced by humans, but by other programs. However, it is perfectly possible to produce graphics or to perform calculations by hand-crafting PostScript programs.

PostScript is an interpreted, stack-based language similar to Forth. The language syntax uses reverse Polish notation, which makes parentheses unnecessary, but reading a program requires some practice, because one has to keep the layout of the stack in mind. Most operators (what other languages term functions) take their arguments from the stack, and place their results onto the stack. Literals (for example numbers) have the effect of placing a copy of themselves on the stack.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Postscript".

All fonts for download were designated FREEWARE, SHAREWARE, or DONORWARE at the time they were added to the collection.